The term “mode of operating” or MO is a very useful investigative tool in identifying perpetrators, especially in serial murders and related crimes.
MO is also recognized in our law as an identifying condition to link suspects to certain crimes to secure a conviction.
Looking at cases or incidents in isolation, will not reveal the links. It is only when you consider the “bigger picture” that you will be able to tie the dots.
When social workers and other “professionals” are couching children during a so-called “forensic assessment” what to say or who to implicate by making use of the illegal practice of asking leading or suggestive questions, that can get them undeniably into serious trouble.
For example, when you get children from various districts or areas, in different timelines, with different (alleged) perpetrators all saying the same wording, that will be a strong indicator of “couching”.
When in different cases, children deviate from what their parents taught them the names of their “private parts” are, and the word somehow “changed” in so-called “forensic reports”, you should smell a rat.
It is impossible for different children to use the same wording like “his private” and “into my private” without being foretold to say so in an affidavit or during testimony in court.
Then, especially when the same individuals are involved in various suspected child sex abuse assessments, then any court will know what really happened during the child interview even if no recordings are presented.
When innocent people go to prison based on these concocted evidence where children are intimidated, manipulated and abused to say things that did not happen, the REAL perpetrators should expect no mercy from our justice system.
Please vote for Abrie’s release…https://www.petitions.net/raaths
Abrie is innocent.The courts must let him out of jail.Its unfair that a innocent man must stay in jail,away from his wife and family
ABRIE is onskuldig en moet vrygelaat word.
ABRIE not guilty off all the lies